Mark Twain said, "It 's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled".
Homer is a constant source of frustration for archaeologists, for philologists and all commentators ... hundreds of pages with thousands of names, events, references, locations,
etc. But they end up confusing rather than help us to clarify them. But if the solution was different from those painstakingly elaborated over the centuries by writers? Why Homer continued to praise the art of deception? Because he slept ... or because it is he who has deceived all of us for 3000 years? And the myths are only fairy tales, or are born from real events of which we just begin to glimpse the origin?

Seven articles of Alberto Majrani on the site of archaeologist Pierluigi Montalbano with automatic translation (you can click on google translator and select INGLESE as language)

Many other abstract in italian here
from the new book by Alberto Majrani entitled L'ASTUTO OMERO The CUNNING HOMER – Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes and the ingenious deception of the Odyssey

mercoledì 18 novembre 2020

But... was Homer blind? NOOO!!!


Was Homer blind? NOOO! In his essay "Greek culture and the origins of European thought", the philologist Bruno Snell highlights how "Homer uses for example a great variety of verbs to denote the operation of sight: ὁρᾶν, ἰδεῖν, λεύσσειν, ἀθρεῖν, θεᾶσθαι, σκέπτεσθαι , ὄσσεσθαι, δενδίλλειν, δέρκεσθαι, παπταίνειν. Of these, several have gone out of use in later Greek, at any rate in prose literature and in the living speech […]. Only two words make their appearance after the time of Homer». I am not here to report the precise meaning of the various verbs, because I should often resort to long turns of words, and whoever wants can easily find the complete explanation on the internet, however it would be really strange if such a lexical richness to express the act of seeing was used by someone who cannot see.

domenica 28 agosto 2016


Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes and the ingenious deception of the Odyssey

a book by Alberto Majrani
with a preface  by Giulio Giorello
Second edition expanded and illustrated

Who killed the suitors? Was it Ulysses  the real culprit of the massacre, or his son Telemachus enlisted the aid of someone else? Who could really be the mysterious stranger, who arrived in Ithaca after two decades and that no one was able to recognize? A careful reading of the Odyssey reveals the myriad of clues left by Homer for the surprising solution. Ulysses was not ... Ulysses, but the best of the achaean archers: Philoctetes! With this key, the Homeric poem suddenly assumes a logic and coherence hitherto unsuspected. This explains why Homer continues to praise the art of deception: it is he who has deceived us for three thousand years! And the surprises do not end there: all the apparent inconsistencies of the Iliad and the Odyssey, which have plagued generations of students and teachers,   establishing the unresolved and deadly "Homeric Question", will find now a brilliant explanation; finally manages to be agreed in a realistic way the ancient texts with historical and archaeological data, fully revealing the genius of their author.

Strange story, that of Ulysses. Is it possible that the king of Ithaca stay away for twenty years, pining of the desire to see his homeland, abandon a beautiful nymph who would make him immortal to return to a wife no longer young, come home after a dangerous solo crossing,  nobody recognizes him, not even the father or the wife herself,  he kill all the pretenders threatening to provoke a bloody revolution, and finally, when he would have every right to sit a little quiet, decides to sail away secretly leaving everyone baffled? All right, it is a mythological tale, but, is not very ... logical!
And if Ulysses had not been ... Ulysses? Let's examine the hypothesis that the son of Ulysses, Telemachus, has hired a mercenary to interpret Ulysses and to slaughter of the suitors, the pretenders to the hand of his mother Penelope: the same Telemachus would then cast a poet to tell a fantastic story that could justify all the years of his father's absence. All this in order to free the royal palace by suitors who were eating all substances; then add, that if someone had married her mother, Telemachus would have lost the right to the succession and the kingdom. In fact she was of noble birth, being the daughter of the powerful King Ikarios, while Ulysses was an "upstart" who had enriched with the art of trade, piracy and looting, activities which at that time the boundaries were quite labile. The claimants themselves, then, were plotting to get rid of him, and then he had to anticipate them as soon as possible.
Who was this mercenary? Can you imagine? Think about it ... and yet suggests it Ulysses himself ... when he is in the land of the Phoenicians. Ulysses claims to be the best of the Achaeans in archery, immediately after Philoctetes!
Philoctetes, who was he? Maybe someone remembers him thanks to the amusing cartoon "Hercules", produced by Disney in 1997, but in that case the script writers were deceived a bit too carried away by the need to invent a fun story, changing the events and roles of various mythological characters, so it will be better to refer to the classical sources. The Iliad tells us that he was the head of a contingent of the Achaeans who were going to the Trojan War. But he had been bitten in the foot by a snake that had caused a serious wound. The wound had become infected enough to force his teammates to abandon him on the island of Lemnos. The mythical tradition, told by Sophocles in his play, says that according to a prophecy, Troy would fall only with the help of weapons of Hercules. Philoctetes had been a pupil of Hercules and had inherited his bow and arrow, so he was recovered and cured by the achaean doctor Machaon; then, just Philoctetes would kill Paris, giving a decisive contribution to the defeat of the Trojans.

Of course! The mercenary was Philoctetes! That explains a lot: he knew Ulysses for some time, and then lent itself well to interpret him; he also was a "family friend" and therefore could be willing to risk his life in such a dangerous undertaking. He was then a skilled archer, evidently accustomed to a "circus number" as to cross with an arrow of twelve lined rings, which also requires a certain training, which Ulysses could not have anymore after so many years at sea. Assuming then that was really equipped with this skill, as in the Iliad, the poem that is much more realistic then Odyssey, the same Ulysses never uses the bow, even during the games in honor of Patroclus, in which he won wrestling and running competitions. Note also that Homer does not say that Philoctetes was abandoned on Lemnos for Ulysses order: this is pretentiousness subsequent of mythographers, then repeated by Sophocles, who reworked the old myths to build on his story, not very differently from what did the authors of Disney! So there is no reason to think that Philoctetes were harboring resentment against Ulysses, or family members.
Logically, the youth of Ithaca did not know Philoctetes, but certainly some elderly people might recognize it, so it would be necessary as soon eclipsed after the mission accomplished. As we have said, he was seriously wounded in the foot by a snake, which was to have left him an obvious lameness. In fact, Homer, without saying so openly, does everything to make us understand that the mysterious stranger limps: it walks slowly, leaning on a cane, is likened to the god Hephaestus, lame he too, there are many strange references to "feet" until the really brilliant expedient  of the old nurse who recognizes "Ulysses" by deep knee injury caused by a wild boar (which is never mentioned either in the Iliad or the rest of the Odyssey, in which the legs of the runner Ulysses are absolutely perfect). The recognition comes just as she washes his feet, so this may mean that the problem was in the foot, and not in the knee! But Philoctetes was not content with a substantial reward, but also aspired to eternal glory! And since he could not reveal the deception, here's an idea to sing it as "the best of the archers Achaean", said even by the great Ulysses. But do you think that the same Ulysses, you could call him a "miles gloriosus" avant la lettre, admitted, in the poem dedicated to him, that there was someone better than him ?? His sentence, rather than a Freudian slip is a real "Message in a Bottle" launched to posterity, as if to say "he who has ears to hear, let him hear!". And Homer has left a host of similar messages throughout the poem, useful for us to guess the actual course of the action.

As Ulysses, probably he had to be dead long time before, killed in battle or drowned on the way back. It can be deduced from the fact that, throughout the Odyssey, the idea that the hero is now deceased is repeated several times so decided, while the hypothesis that it can still be alive is advanced expressed doubt. The same goddess Athena, from the aspect of Mentes merchant, contradicts himself openly, when he says he is not a soothsayer, but still want to make a prophecy, to announce that Ulysses will return. But Mentes lies!
And indeed he urges Telemachus to think to himself how to kill the suitors, being now grown up, so the son of Ulysses part to seek news of his father by his best allies. What about the fact that at some point Ulysses descends into the underworld? Or that in the episode of Polyphemus says his name is Nobody, so the cyclops will repeat that Nobody blinds him, No one kills him? Other messages in bottles, which ... no one, so far, had taken literally! And again, it does not appear very suspect the extraordinary coincidence in time, so that Ulysses would return to Ithaca after two decades, and within hours his son is landing  on the same beach, located on the opposite side to the main port? And then, what should we infer from traditional biographies, under which Homer was blind ?? It could be that the poet was looking for a justification for not recognizing those who passed himself off as Ulysses?

Let's reconstruct  the affair, how could it have taken place in reality. There is a power vacuum in Ithaca, the King left from decades of war and never came back. The suitors are plotting to eliminate Telemachus and take over the kingdom, so he sets sail with a ship full of precious objects to hire a mercenary (Philoctetes already means "the one who loves to possess"). He comes and performs the massacre with the help of the most faithful servants, who, as the swineherd Eumaeus and the cowherd Philoetius, bother inform us that will be adequately rewarded by receiving as prize a beautiful wife, a house and a farm. The fake Ulysses cannot stay there as if nothing had happened, because sooner or later someone would recognize him. So again he sails and leave Telemachus the kingdom. But Telemachus cannot take a bloody "golpe"  and get away with it, so do tell the court poet a long history in which the legitimate sovereign is back with the help of the gods to punish the usurpers. But the poet fits all copious series of clues to let us know how the facts are actually carried out. Why Homer continues to praise the art of deception? For he has deceived us for three thousand years!

In the pages of the book we will discover how the Homeric poem, read in this key, without losing any of his immense literary value, suddenly assumes an unsuspected unity and a logic , and how the solution comes by examining the story from all points of view, not only from that of literary men, who tend to resolve the apparent inconsistencies resorting to simplistic explanations such as poetic license, copying errors, or interpolations occurred is not known when and no one knows why. The Odyssey is not just a fairy tale for overgrown children, but an intricate maze filled with ingenious continuous references that escape inevitably to those who have not a solid scientific background on the shoulders. "Quandoque dormitat bonus Homerus", sometimes also sleeps the good Homer, Horace proclaimed ... but maybe Homer was a lot awakened than we ever believed!

This article is a home-made translation. I will thank you  in advance if you can correct any little error. An article in good english about this on
The new book by Alberto Majrani is titled "The CUNNING HOMER - Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes and the ingenious deception of the Odyssey" and solves ALL (or almost) the problems of the Homeric question and many more on the origin of mythologies. For now (october 2017) is available only in Italian in ePub format, kindle azw3, or pdf. To request the complete ebook with 200 images and about 300 pages of text, at the price of Euro 3,14,  just send an email to . Publishers, journalists, University professors will have a FREE copy.Thank you.
More information on italian, but you can click on google translator and select INGLESE as language)
Il nuovo libro di Alberto Majrani si intitola "L'ASTUTO OMERO - Ulisse, Nessuno, Filottete e il geniale inganno dell'Odissea" e risolve TUTTI (o quasi) i problemi della questione omerica e molti altri sull'origine delle mitologie. Per ora (ottobre 2017)  è disponibile solo in italiano in formato epub, kindle azw3, o pdf. Per richiedere  l'ebook completo, con 200 immagini e circa 300 pagine di testo, al prezzo di euro 3,14, basta inviare una mail ad . Editori, giornalisti, professori universitari riceveranno una copia gratuita. Grazie.
Altre informazioni su

venerdì 26 agosto 2016

Homer told of Nordic sagas?

Iliad and Odyssey. Homer told of  Nordic sagas?
by Alberto Majrani

Who was Homer? And who was Ulysses? Is there a hidden truth behind the immortal verses of the Iliad and the Odyssey?
For three millennia, these questions have intrigued generations of scholars from all over the world. Giambattista Vico used the term "Homeric question" to define the infinite series of puzzles created by the two poems: an authentic indigestible brick for the poor students and the equally poor teachers.
And again: is the Trojan war a truly historic event, or is it only the invention of one or more poets, lived in different ages?
And do the archaeological remains found in the Turkish village of Hissarlik really belong to the city of Priam and Hector, or is this identification only the fruit of the lucid madness of Heinrich Schliemann, an amateur archaeologist, as fortunate as incompetent?
In reality nothing is sure, or scientifically proven. It is a long series of more or less plausible theories and assumptions that have given rise to endless polemics among scholars. At the beginning of the 1990s, two books were published that definitely place the environment where Ulysses and his companions operate in the north. The first is by journalist Iman Wilkens, entitled Where once Troy stood, which locates the ancient Troy in England, recently re-launched thanks to the quote of the novelist Clive Cussler in his Trojan Odyssey. The other, more convincing, albeit with some minor errors that we will examine, is the result of the careful research of a nuclear engineer fond of ancient literature, Felice Vinci, published in an essay titled Omero nel Baltico, published in five Italian editions and recently translated into English with the title The Baltic Origins of Homer's Epic Tales. The Iliad, the Odyssey and the Migration of Myth; the book is also translated  in Russian, Swedish, Estonian, Danish, Lithuanian. and German;  you can read two articles:

The two books have undermined one of the few certainties, namely the Greek origin of  poetry and classical mythology, because although it is true that the poems are written in Greek (but the Homeric Greek is quite different from the classical), the location of the places described by Homer cannot be reconciled with the homonymous localities of the Mediterranean, so much to have generated the rumor according to which "Homer is a poet and not a geographer". I don't know if there is a union of poets that can organize a protest demonstration against the idea that a poet must necessarily be incompetent in geography! And then Homer was a fussy who described everything with a meticulous accuracy, he would hardly always and systematically be wrong right on the core of his stories, that is the life of heroes and navigating peoples. Moreover, is it possible that no one, while he was declaiming his verses in the courts, among warriors, merchants, sailors and other singers, had ever pointed this out to him?
Vinci explains how the Homeric poems are likely to be some Nordic sagas that reached the Mediterranean along the way of amber. This justifies the geographical and climatic incongruities of the stories, such as the cold, often stormy and foggy weather (and the sailing season was summer), the absurd travel routes, the descriptions that do not square, the blond hair of many protagonists, and so on. According to our engineer, the Nordic navigators, went down to Greece to found in the XVI B.C. the Mycenaean civilization (soon we will see how to change this data), they would begin to rename the Mediterranean places based on their places of origin, handed down by mythologies and religions, in the same way as in America or Australia the European colonizers would have made centuries later . We know from the historical testimonies that the ancient geographers renamed the Mediterranean localities; the only substantial novelty introduced by Vinci is that this work was a little wider than previously believed. After a long period of oral transmission, the dark centuries of the so-called Hellenic Middle Ages, the poems would have been put in writing around VIII B.C., when the first written traces and the first representations are found. Synthesizing the myriad of cues of Vinci's volume is impossible; It is amazing that many insiders still ignore it, perhaps for having superficially branded the thesis as absurd without having examined it with the accuracy it requires. We can only add that the preface of the book was written by Professor Rosa Calzecchi Onesti, one of Homer's leading translators, and that prestigious scientific journals have published long essays.

Several Etruscan urns represent Ulysses and the sirens, with a double prows ship, with square sail and shields on the edges, just like the Viking ships.
At the end of 2013, the academic world finally moved: a special issue of the prestigious (and expensive) magazine of Classical and Medieval Culture was published   entirely dedicated to "Scandinavia and the Homeric poems". The vincian theory is appreciated by many scholars, opposed by bitter detractors, and totally ignored by others. In the appendix of my essay "Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes" (Logisma editore and now in the new "L'ASTUTO OMERO" (which you can buy in the form of an ebook here) I took the trouble to make some corrections, both from a geographical point of view and, even more important, from the historical and archaeological one. With the traditional Mediterranean localization of the events, since in the 800 BC the world described by Homer no longer existed for about 400 years, we were forced to hypothesize a long period of oral transmission of the poems, before someone put them in writing. Even Vinci supports the idea of ​​oral transmission, starting even from the sixteenth century. But changing its origin in the Nordic seas everything changes! For example, the Iron Age in Northern Europe began in full force only around VI B.C., so it is not surprising that the weapons described by Homer are made of bronze. The poems could have arrived in the Hellenic world even shortly before the end of the eighth century and immediately transcribed. In this way there is no longer even the need to imagine a long period of orality, moreover with a warlike Middle Ages in the middle, before the poems were put in writing: everything may have happened a few years after the arrival of the storyteller Homer, or someone from his school, in Greece. According to some authors, the Iliad and the Odyssey were officially put in writing for the first time around the VI B.C., at the time of the Athenian tyrant Pisistrato (but this news is not entirely certain). The scholars of the time would have collected and merged into two organic stories the different versions of the poems that were going around in Greece at that time, which could justify some dialectal variations that are found. As for the language, the Greek has much more affinity with the Germanic and Scandinavian languages ​​than with the Mediterranean ones; Greece and some other areas of the Mediterranean have undergone several invasions from the north during the protohistory, and therefore the poems may have come along with one of these migrations, while other invasions in different times and places have brought different languages ​​and dialectal variations in the islands and in the localities of our sea. Or, it can also be hypothesized that the Homeric Greek represented a kind of lingua franca in use along the street of amber, spoken and understood by all the peoples who traded the precious gem. Or we may think that the wandering storytellers, who were in a certain sense the intellectual elite of the time, knew the use of writing, unlike the vast majority of other ancient men. With this new temporal location, the Nordic origin becomes even more plausible, and justifies the absence of archaeological evidence prior to the eighth century. They seem to me to be much more logical hypotheses than that of an oral tradition that lasted centuries, of which there is no trace (not only writings, but not even graffiti, vases, statues), and which gives rise to infinite contradictions. In any case, all these hypotheses, of which each does not automatically exclude the others, but rather can add its effect in various ways, do not undermine the theory, but greatly expand the range of possible dates of the event. However, I would like to recommend to all the scholars of archeology, philology, mythology and simple enthusiasts the book of Felice Vinci, because the amount of suggestions worthy of attention is truly impressive. In other interventions on this site we can see another key , perhaps even more surprising, allows us to identify the origin of certain mythologies of which so far has never been understood much, as well as to clarify further obscure points to which we have mentioned, highlighting the extraordinary coherence of Homer's works and revaluing fully the mastery of their author . Replicating, however, the interpretations that are still taught in schools and universities of the world, the Homeric poems would seem to be a practically unique case, out of all the schemes and all the logic. Without a purpose, without an author, without a client, and that tell stories never happened of characters never existed in places unobtainable, if not at the cost of continuous forcing interpretative. Maybe there's something wrong.

mercoledì 24 agosto 2016

Where were the Pillars of Hercules? And while we’re at it…where was Atlantis?

Where were the Pillars of Hercules? And while we’re at it…where was Atlantis?

By Alberto Majrani, journalist, photographer, and author
Translation by Malena Lagerhorn, author of ILION – the day will come when sacred Troy must die
In a previous post, Iliade e Odissea. Omero raccontò delle saghe nordiche? (in Italian)
 or (in English), we saw how the Homeric stories and the classical mythology take on a much more logical and coherent meaning once you move their origin to the Nordics, from where the amber originates, which we find in many Mediterranean archaeological sites. We will now locate the Pillars of Hercules, another of the enigmas that already captivated the ancients: in fact, the traditional location in the vicinity of the Strait of Gibraltar is, as usual, a mere hypothesis with no solid evidence. The Pillars of Hercules should overlook the ocean and be the ultimate limit of the known world, but beyond Gibraltar, the Spanish coast and Africa continue for several kilometers, and in addition there are no natural formations reminding of real columns, but a steep pinnacle of rock. So the ancient geographers had to place them there because they did not know where else to put them. A whole lot has been said and written in recent times about the possible real location of the mythical Pillars of Hercules,  and I think it is now time for me to speak my mind.
But let us start with looking at who was this formidable hero, by the Romans called Hercules and by the Greeks Heracles. He was the son of the god Zeus and a mortal, Alcmene, and was deified after his death. His cult, under various names, had in ancient times spread throughout Europe. Some ancient historians report that there existed two (or perhaps three) similar characters with the same name, from different eras.
Without bothering to list all of his famous twelve labors, we can see that some of them have a strong Nordic location: the huge Erymanthian boar is stuck in snow, the cattle of the monster Geryon recall of the saga of the Danish Gefjon, the apples of the Hesperides grow in the Hyperborean land, e.g. in the far north. In addition, to collect them, Hercules gets help from Atlas, the giant who holds the starry vault: but the firmament apparently revolves around the north celestial pole, so where could Atlas stand to serve as a pin and hold it up, except in the vicinity of the north pole of the earth?
Finally, the story of the Golden Hind of Artemis, a female deer with golden horns that was yoked to the chariot of the goddess Artemis (Diana), which escapes, as well, to the hyperborean lands before being captured by Hercules. Now, the only kind of deer among which the female has horns is the reindeer, the only deer that can be yoked to a cart is also a reindeer (as Santa Claus teaches…), and finally, the typical deer of the far north, where it migrates long distances, is again, the reindeer! And reindeers do not live in Greece, and certainly never have lived there in the past, since no such fossils have been found, and their physiological characteristics are not suitable for the Greek environment. And yes, there is a small bronze statuette from the eighth century BC that represents a deer nursing a kid, so it is without doubt a female, with a nice pair of horns … but this is a stylized representation and does not look like a real reindeer, but it may well be that the unknown artist made it according to the tales of his or her parents or grandparents, without ever actually having seen one.

Regarding the other eight labors there are no certain geographical locations, although they often are set in water-rich areas, such as at rivers and swamps, as are many other ”Greek” myths: the names of the places, as usual, may be the result of a transposition. The myths are born of real events and then transfigured by subsequent interpretations and continuous word of mouth: the difficulty is to be able to go back to the real events and to the original locations. In this regard, it can be seen that the cult of Hercules, also called Ogmio (or Ogmios, or Ogma, or Ogham), was widespread in all of Northern Europe, including the British Isles, from the remotest antiquity. So if Hercules was a Nordic god, you will understand why the placement of the Pillars of Hercules in the Mediterranean causes many doubts … simply, they are not in the Mediterranean!
So where could these gigantic columns be, located to the extreme limit of the known world, before the scary jump in the ocean, the ”Ocean” river that reminds of the Gulf Stream? Felice Vinci, the author of The Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epic Tales, think they could match the Faroe Islands, while I believe that the ideal location is the north coast of Ireland, where there is an extraordinary natural formation, known today as the ”Giant’s Causeway”, in fact made up by tens of thousands of huge basalt columns! That is, not only by two miserable columns, as they are often represented, but about forty thousand!

According to Irish legend, the columns were built by the giant Fionn Mac Cumhaill, a name that has a strange similarity to Hercules. In fact, this natural wonder dates back to a volcanic eruption that occurred about 60 million years ago, well before humans came along on the face of the earth.
And finally, is it not so that the shallow sandbanks that lie off the coast of the British Isles are the very remains of a certain island sunk in the ocean beyond the Pillars of Hercules that so many are searching for? Between 4000 and 3000 BC there was a cold spike that interrupted the long post-glacial climatic optimum. As a result of this little ice age, the sea level remained lower for about a millennium, bringing into the open a vast territory, which geologists call Doggerland, but after that the area was covered by the ocean again. Something similar occurred in the period between 2000 and 1500 BC. Given that, (I’m kidding, of course!), until you can find a doormat that says ”Welcome to Atlantis” any place for the location of the mythical lost island works, maybe it is time to take a ride in a submarine over there…
One might object that, according to the story handed down by Plato, Atlantis would however have disappeared suddenly, perhaps because of a catastrophic tsunami, a giant ocean wave, such as those that in 2006 brought death and devastation on the coast of India and in 2011 in Japan. Well, if we look to the north, a thousand kilometers from the Irish coast, we find Iceland, an island of glaciers and active volcanoes. In 1996, the eruption of a volcano, located under the huge glacier Vatnajökull, dissolved about 3 kilometers of blocks of ice, creating a huge lake that, after one month, brought down part of the glacier. An appalling mass of water, ice and mud was poured out and submerged a vast region, fortunately almost uninhabited, destroying everything in its path. It is not hard to imagine that something similar, on a larger scale if it occurred during a cold period, with even thicker ice sheets, may have caused the tidal wave that could have destroyed the Atlantean civilization. Large ash clouds could have brought changes to the climate and unusual optical phenomena in the atmosphere, which can be interpreted as a consequence of divine wrath.IMG_1322 Something very similar happened in Santorini, so the two events may have melt together and … confused the imagination of primitive peoples. The very fact that the god of the sea, Poseidon, is called Enosichthon, e.g. ”Earthshaker”, makes one suspect that the ancients had correctly connected tsunamis with earthquakes. Recently, a geological study conducted by the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology found that something similar occurred in the Mediterranean about 8000 years ago when a giant landslide of Mount Etna, of 35 cubic kilometers, caused the destructive flooding of several Neolithic villages at the Middle East coasts. In 6200 BC a landslide of a huge mass of ice on the coast of Norway, known as Storegga Slide, caused a catastrophic tsunami that devastated the island that emerged at the time at the center of Doggerland, and had a huge impact on Mesolithic populations. In fact, Plato speaks of a catastrophe that occurred 9,000 years before Solon, which roughly corresponds with the end of the last ice age, but there are no traces of an evolved civilization, similar to that described by him at that time. Of course, one can always argue that even Plato relays a fantasy story, specially created for educational purposes, and that it has no bearing on reality. But as I said, very often, the myths are born of real events or natural phenomena, of which we lose the sense when they are transported out of their original context, temporal and geographical. The question is to what extent Plato’s account, which is the first in history that speaks explicitly of Atlantis, although many similar myths are found a bit of everywhere, to be taken literally. Other colossal landslides have occurred in the northern regions, due to the rapid rise of the whole territory, which occurred with the melting of the heavy ice sheet. Norwegian steep cliffs are the result of what geologists call glacioeustasy; detached heavy blocks of rock, able to cause destructive waves. If Vinci is correct, identifying Scheria with Norway, it could be argued that the ”great mountain”, with which the vengeful Poseidon covers the land of the Phoenicians, is the memory of one of these disastrous landslides.
It is also possible that the tsunami was caused by the fall of a large meteorite or comet in the ocean, but that might not have left visible geological traces. An event that would remain as such a testimony is the myth of Phaeton, son of Helios, the sun god, who falls into the river Eridanus when riding astray on his father’s sun chariot, too close to the Earth; the nymphs were crying tears of amber, confirming the much more logical placement of the myth in the Nordics: the term originally refered to a European river (perhaps the Rhone or the Rhine, or another river) and then was believed to be the river Po, with the usual mechanism to designate different locations with similar names. In February 2013, the fall of a meteorite in Russia of about ten meters in diameter has provided a spectacular and disturbing example of what could be the effect of a similar incident. The incandescent meteor crossed the atmosphere at the speed of 54,000 km/h, about 44 times the speed of sound, leaving a trail of smoke hundreds of kilometers long, and disintegrated over the city of Chelyabinsk with an explosion comparable to that of an atomic bomb, shattering all windows, injuring thousands and damaging six cities in the region, and concluded its run in a frozen lake. (Video here.)
For sure, even if we talk about Atlantis as a lost ”continent”, an island the size of an entire continent cannot vanish in the course of a few days, without a trace; in addition we cannot use some sort of fantasy-geology to condense time, for geological processes that require hundreds of millions of years! It is possible, however, that there existed a seafaring civilization that lived in coastal areas or on a small island, which was largely swept away by a catastrophic event, and that some of its people survived, maybe in other places, transmitting to their descendants, in the form of myth, days and times gone by. The Neolithic settlement on the Orkney Islands could be remains of this civilization, which because of its importance has been listed by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site. Certainly, nowhere in the world are there any traces of an ancient civilization as technologically advanced as our present one; although some sculptures or graffiti of ambiguous meaning have sparked the imagination of many fans of mysteries; archaeologists have never found objects that were more ”modern” than the archaeologists themselves. Unfortunately, there is no ancient tomb where a plastic jar has been found, or a carbon fiber racket, nor a lightsaber! No one, in the old days to the present day, has ever found any object of some strange material that has not already been invented: if someone had found something like that he or she would immediately have become rich and famous!
Returning to the theme of the columns, it is worth taking a look at another very characteristic place: the Scottish island of Staffa, in the Hebrides. On the island there is a cave (Fingal’s cave, the cave of Fingal, another name of the same Fionn) where the surf produces a kind of very impressive howling, inspiring the composer Felix Mendelssohn in his symphonic poem, and in more recent times, even Pink Floyd in a psychedelic song, never published in the official records and part of the long suite entitled Echoes. But what is most noteworthy is the comparison between his appearance and Homer’s description of the monster Scylla:
Skylla lurks inside it – the yelping horror,
yelping, no louder than any suckling pup
but she’s a grisly monster, I assure you.
No one could look on her with any joy,
not even a god who meets her face-to-face…
She has twelve legs, all writhing, dangling down
and six long swaying necks, a hideous head on each,
each head barbed with a triple row of fangs, thickset,
packed tight – and armed to the hilt with black death!
Holed up in the cavern’s bowels from her waist down
she shoots out her heads, out of that terrifying pit,
angling right from her nest, wildly sweeping the reefs
for dolphins, dogfish or any bigger quarry she can drag
from the thousands Amphitrite spawns in groaning seas.
(The Odyssey, translation by Robert Fagles, ll. 94-107)
Further south, off the coast of Cornwall, lies the archipelago of the Isles of Scilly…

This article is an excerpt from the new book by Alberto Majrani entitled L'ASTUTO OMERO The CUNNING HOMER – Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes and the ingenious deception of the Odyssey 

The first version of the book (in Italian) can be bought on Amazon.

The NEW book by Alberto Majrani is titled "The CUNNING HOMER - Ulysses, Nobody, Philoctetes and the ingenious deception of the Odyssey" and solves ALL (or almost) the problems of the Homeric question and many more on the origin of mythologies. For now (october 2017) is available only in Italian in ePub format, kindle azw3, or pdf. You can see many excerpts of the book here (in italian, but you can click on google translator and select INGLESE as language).  To request the complete ebook with 200 images and about 300 pages of text, at the cost of Euro 3.14 , just send an email to . Publishers, journalists, University professors will have a FREE copy.Thank you.